The Impact of Probiotics on Human Health. A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajmns.v7i4.3357Keywords:
Probiotics, Gut Microbiota, Intestinal Health, Immunity, Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Fermented FoodsAbstract
Probiotics are living micro-organisms that when taken in sufficient quantities will give benefits for health. Being widely used in fermented food products and diet supplements, they are more and more studied as a tool for gastrointestinal, immune and metabolic disorders prevention or management. They suggested that their mechanisms of action are inhibition of pathogens, improvement of intestinal barrier function, generation of antimicrobials, and modulation of immune responses. There have been reports of some evidence of benefit from selected strains in regards to reducing some antibiotic associated diarrheas, improving some of the symptoms associated with irritable bowel syndrome and maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. However, benefits are specific to the strain and not trans-extensible to other products, or diseases. Other formulations in large clinical trials have also failed to yield any benefit. Probiotics are considered to be well-tolerated in individuals who have no underlying health conditions, but also invasive infections can develop in vulnerable patients when given probiotics. This review outlines the mechanisms, potential benefits to health, limitations and safety for the use of probiotics.
References
C. Hill and others, “The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics Consensus Statement on the Scope and Appropriate Use of the Term Probiotic,” Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. & Hepatol., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 506–514, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66.
N. Zmora and others, “Personalized Gut Mucosal Colonization Resistance to Empiric Probiotics Is Associated with Unique Host and Microbiome Features,” Cell, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 1388--1405.e21, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041.
J. Suez and others, “Post-Antibiotic Gut Mucosal Microbiome Reconstitution Is Impaired by Probiotics and Improved by Autologous {FMT},” Cell, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 1406--1423.e16, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.047.
M. Hickson and others, “Use of Probiotic {Lactobacillus} Preparation to Prevent Diarrhoea Associated with Antibiotics: Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial,” BMJ, vol. 335, no. 7610, p. 80, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39231.599815.55.
S. J. Allen and others, “Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria in the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhoea and {Clostridium difficile} Diarrhoea in Older Inpatients: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Trial,” Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9900, pp. 1249–1257, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61218-0.
P. J. Whorwell and others, “Efficacy of an Encapsulated Probiotic {Bifidobacterium infantis} 35624 in Women with Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Am. J. Gastroenterol., vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 1581–1590, Jul. 2006.
W. Kruis and others, “Maintaining Remission of Ulcerative Colitis with the Probiotic {Escherichia coli} Nissle 1917 Is as Effective as with Standard Mesalazine,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1617–1623, Nov. 2004.
S. B. Freedman and others, “Multicenter Trial of a Combination Probiotic for Children with Gastroenteritis,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 379, no. 21, pp. 2015–2026, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802597.
M. Kalliomäki and others, “Probiotics in Primary Prevention of Atopic Disease: A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial,” Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9262, pp. 1076–1079, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04259-8.
K. Costeloe and others, “{Bifidobacterium breve} {BBG-001} in Very Preterm Infants: A Randomised Controlled Phase 3 Trial,” Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10019, pp. 649–660, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01027-2.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Risk of Invasive Disease in Preterm Infants Given Probiotics Formulated to Contain Live Bacteria or Yeast,” Sep. 2023.
L. V McFarland, C. T. Evans, and E. J. C. Goldstein, “Strain-Specificity and Disease-Specificity of Probiotic Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Front. Med., vol. 5, p. 124, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00124.
Y. Zhang et al., “Effects of Probiotic Type, Dose and Treatment Duration on Irritable Bowel Syndrome Diagnosed by {Rome III} Criteria: A Meta-Analysis,” BMC Gastroenterol., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 62, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0470-z.
S. M. Gibbons et al., “Perspective: Leveraging the Gut Microbiota to Predict Personalized Responses to Dietary, Prebiotic, and Probiotic Interventions,” Adv. Nutr., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1450–1461, 2022, doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac075.
T. S. Ghosh, F. Shanahan, and P. W. O’Toole, “The Gut Microbiome as a Modulator of Healthy Ageing,” Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. & Hepatol., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 565–584, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00605-x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Noor Raad Sawsdi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
