Quorum Sensing and Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajmns.v7i4.3355Keywords:
Autoinducers, Quorum-sensing, LuxR, LuxI, Acyl homoserine lactoneAbstract
is the process of modifying gene expression in reaction to changes within the population of cells density. Gene expression is impacted by an autoinducer's minimal threshold stimulatory dosage. Each Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterium employs quorum sensing signaling circuits to regulate various kinds of biological functions. Acylated homoserine lactones are frequently by bacteria that are gram-negative as autoinducers. Another means of communication involving microorganisms that are Gram-positive and Gram-negative is through processed oligo-peptides. According to current study, autoinducer-mediated cell-cell interaction occurs both inside and as well as amongst bacterium species, growing proof that bacterial autoinducers cause distinct reactions in their hosts. Bacteria are able to coordinate gene expression through mutual interaction, although the target genes, signal relay systems, and chemical signals mediated by bacterial quorum sensing systems differ, and so the collective response of society in any given circumstance. Therefore, one of the earliest steps toward multi-cellularity may have been the emergence of quorum sensing systems in bacteria. We will review in this article the mechanism of both quorum sensing and Autoinducers and explain the role of both gram negative and negative bacteria according to their transcription factor and the advantage that they have been effect on life.
References
I. Ali, K. O. Alfarouk, S. J. Reshkin, and M. E. Ibrahim, “Doxycycline as potential anti-cancer agent,” Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1617–1623, 2017, doi: 10.2174/1871520617666170213111951.
G. A. O'Toole, “Classic spotlight: Quorum sensing and the multicellular life of unicellular organisms,” J. Bacteriol., vol. 198, no. 4, p. 601, 2016, doi: 10.1128/JB.00956-15.
X. Li, J. Jin, X. Zhang, et al., “Quantifying the optimal strategy of population control of quorum sensing network in Escherichia coli,” NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl., vol. 7, no. 1, Art. no. 35, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41540-021-00196-4.
B. Rémy, S. Mion, L. Plener, M. Elias, E. Chabrière, and D. Daudé, “Interference in bacterial quorum sensing: A biopharmaceutical perspective,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 9, Art. no. 203, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00203.
D. N. McBrayer, C. D. Cameron, and Y. Tal-Gan, “Development and utilization of peptide-based quorum sensing modulators in Gram-positive bacteria,” Org. Biomol. Chem., vol. 18, no. 37, pp. 7273–7290, 2020, doi: 10.1039/D0OB01421D.
Ö. Acet, D. Erdönmez, B. Ö. Acet, and M. Odabaşı, “N-acyl homoserine lactone molecules assisted quorum sensing: Effects, consequences and monitoring of bacteria talking in real life,” Arch. Microbiol., vol. 203, pp. 3739–3749, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02381-9.
P. V. Bramhachari, Implication of Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Medicine, Agriculture and Food Industry. Singapore: Springer, 2019.
L. Machineni, “Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on biofilm growth dynamics and their heterogeneous response to antibiotic challenge,” J. Biosci., vol. 45, no. 1, Art. no. 25, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12038-020-9990-3.
E. Dolson and C. Ofria, “Digital evolution for ecology research: A review,” Front. Ecol. Evol., vol. 9, Art. no. 750779, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.750779.
L. Yi, X. Dong, D. Grenier, K. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Research progress of bacterial quorum sensing receptors: Classification, structure, function and characteristics,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 763, Art. no. 143031, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143031.
A. A. Bridges, J. A. Prentice, N. S. Wingreen, and B. L. Bassler, “Signal transduction network principles underlying bacterial collective behaviors,” Annu. Rev. Microbiol., vol. 76, pp. 235–257, 2022, doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-042922-122020.
G. Coquant, J.-P. Grill, and P. Seksik, “Impact of N-acyl-homoserine lactones, quorum sensing molecules, on gut immunity,” Front. Immunol., vol. 11, Art. no. 1827, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01827.
K. Stephens and W. E. Bentley, “Quorum sensing from two engineers’ perspectives,” Isr. J. Chem., vol. 63, no. 5–6, Art. no. e202200083, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ijch.202200083.
S. Maloy and K. Hughes, Eds., Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press, 2013.
C. Deng, Y. Wu, X. Lv, J. Li, Y. Liu, G. Du, et al., “Refactoring transcription factors for metabolic engineering,” Biotechnol. Adv., vol. 57, Art. no. 107935, 2022.
A. S. Seshasayee, K. Sivaraman, and N. M. Luscombe, “An overview of prokaryotic transcription factors: A summary of function and occurrence in bacterial genomes,” Subcell. Biochem., vol. 52, pp. 7–23, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9069-0_2.
P. Weidemüller, M. Kholmatov, E. Petsalaki, and J. B. Zaugg, “Transcription factors: Bridge between cell signaling and gene regulation,” Proteomics, vol. 21, nos. 23–24, Art. no. 2000034, 2021.
Y. Xiao, H. Zou, J. Li, et al., “Impact of quorum sensing signaling molecules in Gram-negative bacteria on host cells: Current understanding and future perspectives,” Gut Microbes, vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. 2039048, 2022, doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2039048.
S. Pattnaik, “Quorum sensing in Gram-positive bacteria,” in Natural Products. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, pp. 13–24.
M. Nag, D. Lahiri, A. Ghosh, D. Das, and R. R. Ray, “Quorum sensing,” in Biofilm-Mediated Diseases: Causes and Controls, R. R. Ray, M. Nag, and D. Lahiri, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp. 21–45.
M. Haque, S. Islam, M. A. Sheikh, et al., “Quorum sensing: A new prospect for the management of antimicrobial-resistant infectious diseases,” Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 571–586, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1843427.
B. Yang, D. Fang, Q. Lv, Z. Wang, and Y. Liu, “Targeted therapeutic strategies in the battle against pathogenic bacteria,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 12, Art. no. 673239, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.673239.
Y. Su and T. Ding, “Targeting microbial quorum sensing: The next frontier to hinder bacterial-driven gastrointestinal infections,” Gut Microbes, vol. 15, no. 2, Art. no. 2252780, 2023, doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2252780.
J.-N. Cai and D. Kim, “Biofilm ecology associated with dental caries: Understanding of microbial interactions in oral communities leads to development of therapeutic strategies targeting cariogenic biofilms,” in Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol. 122, G. M. Gadd and S. Sariaslani, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press, 2023, pp. 27–75.
K. Krasulova and P. Illes, “Intestinal interplay of quorum sensing molecules and human receptors,” Biochimie, vol. 189, pp. 108–119, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2021.06.010.
F. Chen, Y. Gao, X. Chen, Z. Yu, and X. Li, “Quorum quenching enzymes and their application in degrading signal molecules to block quorum sensing-dependent infection,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 17477–17500, 2013, doi: 10.3390/ijms140917477.
C. Pietschke, C. Treitz, S. Forêt, et al., “Host modification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal induces a phenotypic switch in bacterial symbionts,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 114, no. 40, pp. E8488–E8497, 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.170687911.
G. Alagarasan, K. S. Aswathy, and M. Madhaiyan, “Shoot the message, not the messenger—Combating pathogenic virulence in plants by inhibiting quorum sensing mediated signaling molecules,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 8, Art. no. 556, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00556.
T. P. Pavlic, J. Hanson, G. Valentini, S. I. Walker, and S. C. Pratt, “Quorum sensing without deliberation: Biological inspiration for externalizing computation to physical spaces in multi-robot systems,” Swarm Intell., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 171–203, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11721-021-00196-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Noor Riyadh Almzil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
