Structure of Complications and Risk Factors in Various Methods of Orthopedic Rehabilitation for Edentulism

Kurbonov Dilshod  Farkhodovich; Tozhiev Feruz  Ibodulla ugli; Mukimov Ikrom  Ilkhomovich; Ismoilkhodjaeva Komila  Gani kizi; Karimov Shohrukh  Ilkhom ugli

doi:10.51699/cajmns.v7i3.3298

Authors

Kurbonov Dilshod Farkhodovich doctoral candidate, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery Tashkent State Medical University
Tozhiev Feruz Ibodulla ugli Doctor of Sciences (DSc), Associate Professor Tashkent State Medical University
Mukimov Ikrom Ilkhomovich PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry Tashkent International Chemical University
Ismoilkhodjaeva Komila Gani kizi Master's student, Department of Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery Tashkent State Medical University
Karimov Shohrukh Ilkhom ugli basic doctoral candidate Tashkent State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajmns.v7i3.3298

Keywords:

secondary edentulism, partial edentulism, complete edentulism, clinical and anamnestic characteristics, radiological diagnostics, dental implantation, subperiosteal implants, alveolar process deficiency, orthopedic dentistry

Abstract

A comprehensive assessment of the long-term outcomes and safety of orthopedic rehabilitation methods requires a detailed analysis of the resulting complications and a systematization of the factors predisposing their development. Identifying correlations between the applied treatment technology, the patient's premorbid background, and the frequency of adverse events makes it possible to develop risk prediction algorithms and optimize clinical protocols. The article presents the results of a systematic analysis of intra- and postoperative complications recorded during prospective observation. All cases of complications were recorded on standardized individual observation charts from the time of surgery until the completion of a 12-month monitoring period. Complications were classified according to their clinical form, localization, time of onset, and severity using the modified Clavien-Dindo scale.

References

Y. Z. Azaryev and A. M. Ushakov, “Modern technologies for manufacturing individual subperiostal implants,” Clinical Dentistry, no. 3, pp. 78–81, 2012.

M. Azimov and K. Shomurodov, “A new method of uranoplasty in patients with congenital cleft palate,” Stomatology, vol. 1, no. 3(68), pp. 55–57, 2017.

R. S. Alimbayev and Y. Z. Azaryev, “Subperiostal implantation in jaw bone tissue atrophy,” Stomatology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 45–48, 2015.

P.-I. Branemark, Osteointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Moscow, Russia: Medicine, 2016.

E. I. Gavrilov and A. S. Shcherbakov, Implants and Implantation. Moscow, Russia: Medicine, 2018.

S. Yu. Ivanov, “Application of CAD/CAM technologies in dental implantology,” Stomatologist, no. 2, pp. 34–38, 2020.

A. K. Jordanishvili, Age-Related Changes in the Masticatory and Speech Apparatus. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Man Publishing House, 2018.

G. B. Kobzeva, S. N. Gontarev, and M. Yasin, “The relationship between an individual's psychological status and disease remission using chronic generalized periodontitis of mild severity as an example,” Bulletin of New Medical Technologies, vol. 6, pp. 58–62, 2019.

A. A. Lukyanenko and I. A. Kazantseva, “Changes in the self-assessment of pensioners' health status after dental implantation,” Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University, vol. 1, no. 73, pp. 93–97, 2020.

N. M. Pogosyan, M. S. Novojilova, R. S. Gabov, and I. P. Ryzhova, “Development of a minimally invasive method for preparing bone tissue for implantation using the biological potential of one's own body,” Current Problems of Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 249–256, 2020.

I. P. Ryzhova, A. S. Efimova, and N. M. Pogosyan, “Optimization of bone alveolar preparation for implant prosthetics,” in Proc. Scientific Message of Higher School – Real Achievements of Practical Healthcare, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, 2018, pp. 837–839.

V. A. Sharanda and O. P. Chudakov, “Algorithms for the comprehensive rehabilitation of patients after surgical methods for treating jaw bone tissue pathology,” in Proc. International Scientific-Practical Conference ‘Modern Technologies in Medical Education’, Minsk, Belarus, 2021, pp. 1480–1481.

M. S. Alauddin, A. S. Baharuddin, and M. I. Mohd Ghazali, “The modern and digital transformation of oral health care: A mini review,” Healthcare, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 118, 2021.

G. Michelinakis, D. Apostolakis, P. Kamposiora, G. Papavasiliou, and M. Özcan, “The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: A narrative review,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 37, 2021.

G. Pellegrino, C. Mangano, R. Mangano, A. Ferri, V. Taraschi, and C. Marchetti, “Augmented reality for dental implantology: A pilot clinical report of two cases,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 158, 2019.

F. I. Tozhiev et al., “A New Method for Plastics of Upper Jaw Defects with Individually Designed Titanium Implants for Congenital Cleft of the Upper Lip and Palate,” Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 620–623, 2023.

F. I. Tozhiev et al., “Effectiveness of the method of upper jaw defects using individual titanium structures in congenital cleft of the upper lip and palate,” European Scholar Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 135–140.